[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTik3GZ0b5S7p4ONQu4Hb8LoKewmMJ7_J5zvumYD-@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:37:50 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] block drivers for 2.6.39-rc
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> This driver does not build at all:
>
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c:1187:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘generic_find_next_zero_le_bit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c:1190:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘generic_find_next_le_bit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c:1290:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘generic___test_and_set_le_bit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c:1292:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘generic___test_and_clear_le_bit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c:1441:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘generic_test_le_bit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> Has this been build-tested? These APIs do not exist upstream.
Actually, I think that's just a merge error - those horrible nasty
crazy names did use to exist.
Does this fix it? (Untested!)
Linus
View attachment "patch.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (2111 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists