[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikzpC9DdaoWaUTvO98jnjFdJOomwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:25:24 -0700
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
To: Sean Noonan <Sean.Noonan@...sigma.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin Bligh <Martin.Bligh@...sigma.com>,
Trammell Hudson <Trammell.Hudson@...sigma.com>,
Christos Zoulas <Christos.Zoulas@...sigma.com>,
"linux-xfs@....sgi.com" <linux-xfs@....sgi.com>,
Stephen Degler <Stephen.Degler@...sigma.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: XFS memory allocation deadlock in 2.6.38
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Sean Noonan <Sean.Noonan@...sigma.com> wrote:
>> Could you test if you see the deadlock before
>> 5ecfda041e4b4bd858d25bbf5a16c2a6c06d7272 without MAP_POPULATE ?
>
> Built and tested 72ddc8f72270758951ccefb7d190f364d20215ab.
> Confirmed that the original bug does not present in this version.
> Confirmed that removing MAP_POPULATE does cause the deadlock to occur.
It seems that the test (without MAP_POPULATE) reveals that the root
cause is an xfs bug, which had been hidden up to now by MAP_POPULATE
preallocating disk blocks (but could always be triggered by the same
test without the MAP_POPULATE flag). I'm not sure how to go about
debugging the xfs deadlock; it would probably be best if an xfs person
could have a look ?
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists