linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: Propagate uA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:53:11 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: Propagate uA_load requirements up supply
 chain

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 07:14:15PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> That's not true.  Firstly, *all* regulators are not 100% efficient.  They
> lose *power* in the form of heat.  So power into the regulator will always
> be more than power out.

That's pretty much what I said, yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/