[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1301395206.583.53.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:40:06 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Maxin John <maxin.john@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Baluta <dbaluta@...acom.com>,
naveen yadav <yad.naveen@...il.com>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: kmemleak for MIPS
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 22:15 +0100, Maxin John wrote:
> > Just add "depends on MIPS" and give it a try.
> As per your suggestion, I have tried it in my qemu environment (MIPS malta).
>
> With a minor modification in arch/mips/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S (added the
> symbol _sdata ), I was able to add kmemleak support for MIPS.
>
> Output in MIPS (Malta):
You may want to disable the kmemleak testing to reduce the amount of
leaks reported.
> debian-mips:~# uname -a
> Linux debian-mips 2.6.38-08826-g1788c20-dirty #4 SMP Mon Mar 28
> 23:22:04 EEST 2011 mips GNU/Linux
> debian-mips:~# mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug/
> debian-mips:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
> unreferenced object 0x8f95d000 (size 4096):
> comm "swapper", pid 1, jiffies 4294937330 (age 467.240s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> backtrace:
> [<80529644>] alloc_large_system_hash+0x2f8/0x410
> [<8053864c>] udp_table_init+0x4c/0x158
> [<80538774>] udp_init+0x1c/0x94
> [<80538b34>] inet_init+0x184/0x2a0
> [<80100584>] do_one_initcall+0x174/0x1e0
> [<8051f348>] kernel_init+0xe4/0x174
> [<80103d4c>] kernel_thread_helper+0x10/0x18
> unreferenced object 0x8f95e000 (size 4096):
> comm "swapper", pid 1, jiffies 4294937330 (age 467.240s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> backtrace:
> [<80529644>] alloc_large_system_hash+0x2f8/0x410
> [<8053864c>] udp_table_init+0x4c/0x158
> [<8053881c>] udplite4_register+0x24/0xa8
> [<80538b3c>] inet_init+0x18c/0x2a0
> [<80100584>] do_one_initcall+0x174/0x1e0
> [<8051f348>] kernel_init+0xe4/0x174
> [<80103d4c>] kernel_thread_helper+0x10/0x18
These are probably false positives. Since the pointer referring this
block (udp_table) is __read_mostly, is it possible that the
corresponding section gets placed outside the _sdata.._edata range?
diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/cache.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/cache.h
index 650ac9b..b4db69f 100644
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/cache.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/cache.h
@@ -17,6 +17,6 @@
#define SMP_CACHE_SHIFT L1_CACHE_SHIFT
#define SMP_CACHE_BYTES L1_CACHE_BYTES
-#define __read_mostly __attribute__((__section__(".data.read_mostly")))
+#define __read_mostly __attribute__((__section__(".data..read_mostly")))
#endif /* _ASM_CACHE_H */
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/mips/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
index 570607b..6f6d5d0 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ SECTIONS
INIT_TASK_DATA(PAGE_SIZE)
NOSAVE_DATA
CACHELINE_ALIGNED_DATA(1 << CONFIG_MIPS_L1_CACHE_SHIFT)
+ READ_MOSTLY_DATA(1 << CONFIG_MIPS_L1_CACHE_SHIFT)
DATA_DATA
CONSTRUCTORS
}
> unreferenced object 0x8f072000 (size 4096):
> comm "swapper", pid 1, jiffies 4294937680 (age 463.840s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> backtrace:
> [<801ba3d8>] __kmalloc+0x130/0x180
> [<805461bc>] flow_cache_cpu_prepare+0x50/0xa8
> [<8053746c>] flow_cache_init_global+0x90/0x138
> [<80100584>] do_one_initcall+0x174/0x1e0
> [<8051f348>] kernel_init+0xe4/0x174
> [<80103d4c>] kernel_thread_helper+0x10/0x18
Same here, flow_cachep pointer is __read_mostly.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists