linux-kernel - Blkio: Apply two policies on one IO process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <201103300000153595438@foxmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:16 +0800
From:	"Lina Lu" <lulina_nuaa@...mail.com>
To:	"Vivek Goyal" <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc:	"linux kernel mailing list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Blkio: Apply two policies on one IO process

Hi Vivek,
      As the weight and throttle policies are on different layers, someone can apply 
these two policies on one IO pid at one time. And the IO bandwidth will be controlled
with the more stringent policy.
      If someone first set two policies on one pid, then want to remove the weight
policy, he must first echo the pid to parent dir's tasks, then echo the throttle policy
to parent dir's blkio.throttle_xx_xx_device. These steps seen to be cumbersome.
      This is because the weight policy can be applied independence, but the throttle
policy is always accompany with the weight policy(default 500). I think it will be 
better that these policies are independent of each other. What is your opinion?
      Additional, do you recommend applying two policies on one IO process?

Thanks
Lina

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/