[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D920C9B.5070405@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:45:15 -0400
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: debora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jirislaby@...il.com,
preining@...ic.at
Subject: Re: [patch 1/8] tpm_tis: Use timeouts returned from TPM
On 03/29/2011 10:34 AM, Rajiv Andrade wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Some comments:
>
> On 03/15/2011 08:13 AM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> v3:
>> - sysfs entry now called 'durations' to resemble TPM-speak (previously
>> was called 'timeouts')
>>
>> v2:
>> - adjusting all timeouts for TPM devices reporting timeouts in msec rather
>> than usec
> This is a bugfix that's different than the one you originally sent, can you
> submit this as a separated patch? This is mainly for easier debug in the
> future, so each feature/bugfix/commit can be tested separately.
Originally I sent a patch that corrected the evaluation of the return
code within the TPM's response and introduced the sysfs entry. I did not
scale the MEDIUM and LONG timeouts, which then caused the problems on
the Infineon TPM and the patch was removed. I then introduced the
scaling of the MEDIUM and LONG timeouts, which seems necessary as a
consequence to working with the TPM-reported timeouts. Then adding a
sysfs entry to it is an additional feature. I'd split this patch in 2
patches where the 2nd one introduces the sysfs entry. Is this ok with you?
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists