[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1301421032.2250.432.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:50:32 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] seqlock,lockdep: Add lock primitives to read_seqbegin().
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 15:39 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> That said, there are some out-standing issues with rw_locks and lockdep,
> Gautham and I worked on that for a while but we never persevered and
> finished it..
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/11/203
I just did a quick rebase onto tip/master (compile tested only):
http://programming.kicks-ass.net/sekrit/patches-lockdep.tar.bz2
That series needs testing and a few patches to extend the
lib/locking-selftest* bits to cover the new functionality.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists