[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110329182154.GA18913@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 20:21:54 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] lockdep: Print a nice description of an irq locking
issue
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> > After having to explain lockdep interrupt locking inversions a few
> > times, I decided to have lockdep spit out the scenario that it is
> > complaining about.
>
> Looks very useful!
>
> Would you be interested in extending this to other lockdep splats as well?
In separate patches, of course.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists