[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110329194323.GA27840@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:43:24 -0400
From: 'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@...radead.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: 'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@...radead.org>,
Sean Noonan <Sean.Noonan@...sigma.com>,
'Michel Lespinasse' <walken@...gle.com>,
"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin Bligh <Martin.Bligh@...sigma.com>,
Trammell Hudson <Trammell.Hudson@...sigma.com>,
Christos Zoulas <Christos.Zoulas@...sigma.com>,
"'linux-xfs@....sgi.com'" <linux-xfs@....sgi.com>,
Stephen Degler <Stephen.Degler@...sigma.com>,
"'linux-mm@...ck.org'" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: XFS memory allocation deadlock in 2.6.38
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 09:39:07PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > - ptr = vmalloc(size);
> > + ptr = __vmalloc(size, GFP_NOFS | __GFP_HIGHMEM, PAGE_KERNEL);
> > if (ptr)
> > memset(ptr, 0, size);
> > return ptr;
>
> Note that vmalloc is currently broken in that it does a GFP_KERNEL
> allocation if it has to allocate page table pages, even when invoked
> with GFP_NOFS:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=128942194520631&w=4
Oh great. In that case we had a chance to hit the deadlock even before
the offending commit, just a much smaller one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists