linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/23] fujitsu-laptop: Convert printks to pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1301439013.4113.12.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date:	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:50:13 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...sics.adelaide.edu.au>
Cc:	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/23] fujitsu-laptop: Convert printks to pr_<level>

On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 08:12 +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> what does pr_*() give us over printk()?
 
Consistency in use of prefix.

> I presume it makes it easier to selectively remove certain
> printk levels from the kernel image in the
> name of size reduction.

That's the goal, but there's no support in the
standard kernel for that yet.

It should also in the future make the prefix a
singleton and remove it from the format string
making the image text a bit smaller.

> Some people *may* insist that these long (>80 character) pr_err() lines be
> split so they remain <80 in length.  This was the reason why the original
> printk() call was split like it was.

I don't.
It makes grepping source for strings easier.

cheers, Joe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/