[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01ea01cbeeb6$99bb5240$cd31f6c0$@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:43:52 +0800
From: "Guan Xuetao" <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>
To: "'Arnd Bergmann'" <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "'Paul Mundt'" <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] unicore32 framebuffer driver fix: make videomemory kmalloc-ed and floatable
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd@...db.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 2:54 PM
> To: Guan Xuetao
> Cc: 'Paul Mundt'; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] unicore32 framebuffer driver fix: make videomemory kmalloc-ed and floatable
>
> On Wednesday 30 March 2011 03:39:26 Guan Xuetao wrote:
> > > How does this work? UNIFB_MEMSIZE seems to be 4 MB, much more than the
> > > maximum of 128 KB that kmalloc can allocate.
> > >
> > > Shouldn't this use get_free_pages() instead of kmalloc?
> > >
> >
> > When using SLUB allocator, if required memory size is larger
> > than 2*PAGE_SIZE, kmalloc_large is called,
> > and eventually __get_free_pages will be called.
> > So, it would be the same as __get_free_pages.
>
> Ok, I see. It's probably still better to use __get_free_pages directly,
> because it's possible to select a different allocator that does not
> do this itself.
>
> Arnd
Is it appropriate to using __get_free_pages in framebuffer driver?
And both SLAB and SLUB allocators support 4MB request.
Thanks & Regards.
Guan Xuetao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists