[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D9312BF.6010406@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:23:43 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: eliminate ELEVATOR_INSERT_REQUEUE
On 2011-03-30 13:20, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Jens.
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:16:13PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static bool blk_kick_flush(struct request_queue *q)
>> q->flush_rq.end_io = flush_end_io;
>>
>> q->flush_pending_idx ^= 1;
>> - elv_insert(q, &q->flush_rq, ELEVATOR_INSERT_REQUEUE);
>> + __elv_add_request(q, &q->flush_rq, ELEVATOR_INSERT_FLUSH);
>
> Shouldn't this be list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &q->queue_head)?
> __elv_add_request(FLUSH) calls back into blk_insert_flush() which
> decomposes the flush request from FS into flush sequence.
> blk_kick_flush() is used to insert the decomposed sequence requests
> into the dispatch queue.
Mid-air collision, I just sent that addon out to Sergey who tested. Yes
of course it should be a regular list_add, the above is a braino.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists