linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf: Rebase max unprivileged mlock threshold on top of page size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110330145324.GB2204@nowhere>
Date:	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:53:28 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Stable <stable@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Rebase max unprivileged mlock threshold on top
 of page size

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 04:40:28PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 16:04 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > +int sysctl_perf_event_mlock __read_mostly = (129 * PAGE_SIZE) / 1024; /* 'free' kb per user */
> 
> I'm fairly sure you don't want to do this either: 
>   512 + (PAGE_SIZE / 1024)
> should do I think, there's no reason to further inflate things for large
> page platforms.

Right, that also requires to fix tools that use a default number of pages instead
of computing nr_pages on top of page size and a default kb size.

Will respin by fixing both sides.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/