[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1301448497.14261.319.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 21:28:17 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Manjunatha Halli <manjunatha_halli@...com>,
Manjunatha Halli <manjunatha_halli@...com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: [BUG] NULL pointer dereference in dev_get_drvdata
While running ktest.pl with randconfig tests on latest Linus (before
2.6.38-rc9 was released), several tests triggered a bug similar to this:
Starting udev: udevd-work[880]: '/usr/bin/vmmouse_detect' unexpected exit with status 0x000b
udevd-work[881]: '/usr/bin/vmmouse_detect' unexpected exit with status 0x000b
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000018
IP: [<ffffffff818a6e9e>] dev_get_drvdata+0xe/0x39
PGD 74dc7067 PUD 741ef067 PMD 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
last sysfs file: /sys/devices/virtual/net/teql0/address
CPU 1
Modules linked in: ide_pci_generic iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support ide_core
Pid: 994, comm: v4l_id Not tainted 2.6.38-test-09043-gc585015 #1 /DG965MQ
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff818a6e9e>] [<ffffffff818a6e9e>] dev_get_drvdata+0xe/0x39
RSP: 0018:ffff8800743dbb68 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8800743dbba0 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: ffffffff8408b740 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000010
RBP: ffff8800743dbb68 R08: ffff8800743dbb98 R09: 00000000000023e7
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: ffff88007784f888 R14: ffff880076f82140 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 00007f4059724700(0000) GS:ffff88007e280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000018 CR3: 00000000742bb000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process v4l_id (pid: 994, threadinfo ffff8800743da000, task ffff880074dac420)
Stack:
ffff8800743dbb88 ffffffff818e4129 ffff880074dac420 ffffffff8408b740
ffff8800743dbbc8 ffffffff818e1865 2222222222222222 2222222222222222
ffff88007784f000 0000000000000000 ffff88007784f888 ffff880076f82140
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff818e4129>] st_kim_ref+0x2c/0x42
[<ffffffff818e1865>] st_register+0x29/0x444
[<ffffffff81dc6415>] fmc_prepare+0x75/0x382
[<ffffffff81dc9109>] fm_v4l2_fops_open+0x5a/0xce
[<ffffffff81d40bab>] v4l2_open+0x180/0x212
[<ffffffff811c6fc5>] chrdev_open+0x1c5/0x204
[<ffffffff811c6e00>] ? cdev_put+0x45/0x45
[<ffffffff811bf61e>] __dentry_open+0x2a1/0x467
[<ffffffff811c0bd8>] nameidata_to_filp+0x75/0x83
[<ffffffff811d2c5f>] do_last+0x716/0x902
[<ffffffff811d02e7>] ? path_init+0x1fd/0x46f
[<ffffffff811d3d07>] path_openat+0x102/0x4cd
[<ffffffff811d413d>] do_filp_open+0x6b/0xb5
[<ffffffff822671ab>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x40/0x4c
[<ffffffff811e387e>] ? alloc_fd+0x165/0x17e
[<ffffffff811c0c7f>] do_sys_open+0x99/0x16a
[<ffffffff811c0d77>] sys_open+0x27/0x30
[<ffffffff82270a82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Code: 90 55 48 89 e5 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 ff 05 ac 70 5d 02 f0 ff 07 48 ff 05 aa 70 5d 02 c9 c3 55 48 89 e5 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 85 ff 74 20
8b 47 08 48 ff 05 97 70 5d 02 48 85 c0 74 10 48 8b 80 b8 00
RIP [<ffffffff818a6e9e>] dev_get_drvdata+0xe/0x39
RSP <ffff8800743dbb68>
CR2: 0000000000000018
As not all configs triggered this, but when a config did trigger it, it
was consistent. I ran the "config-bisect" of ktest.pl to find the dirty
culprit, and it came up with:
***************************************
Found bad config: CONFIG_RADIO_WL128X
***************************************
When I removed the config, sure enough, the bug goes away. I added it
back in and the bug re-appeared.
The .config can be downloaded here:
http://rostedt.homelinux.com/private/mxtest-boot-randconfig-fail-20110228232103/config
and the full dmesg here:
http://rostedt.homelinux.com/private/mxtest-boot-randconfig-fail-20110228232103/dmesg
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists