[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1301450041.3981.55.camel@sli10-conroe>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:54:01 +0800
From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]mmap: add alignment for some variables
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 09:41 +0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:36:40 +0800 Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > > how is it that this improves things?
> > Hmm, it actually is:
> > struct percpu_counter {
> > spinlock_t lock;
> > s64 count;
> > #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> > struct list_head list; /* All percpu_counters are on a list */
> > #endif
> > s32 __percpu *counters;
> > } __attribute__((__aligned__(1 << (INTERNODE_CACHE_SHIFT))))
> > so lock and count are in one cache line.
>
> ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp would achieve that?
____cacheline_aligned_in_smp can't guarantee the cache alignment for
multiple nodes, because the variable can be updated by multiple
nodes/cpus.
Thanks,
Shaohua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists