linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: When constraining modes fall back to higher power modes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1301512485.3375.33.camel@odin>
Date:	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:14:45 +0100
From:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: When constraining modes fall back to higher
 power modes

On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 06:29 +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> If a mode requested by a consumer is not allowed by constraints
> automatically fall back to a higher power mode if possible. This
> ensures that consumers get at least the output they requested while
> allowing machine drivers to transparently limit lower power modes
> if required.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---

Applied.

Thanks

Liam

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/