[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110330213338.GA20367@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:33:38 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: jln@...gle.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...e.de,
ak@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...nel.org, tim.bird@...sony.com,
Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [226/275] Prevent rt_sigqueueinfo and
rt_tgsigqueueinfo from spoofing the signal code
On 03/30, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> --- linux-2.6.35.y.orig/kernel/signal.c 2011-03-29 22:50:25.616602954 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.35.y/kernel/signal.c 2011-03-29 23:03:02.941224912 -0700
> @@ -2410,9 +2410,13 @@
> return -EFAULT;
>
> /* Not even root can pretend to send signals from the kernel.
> - Nor can they impersonate a kill(), which adds source info. */
> - if (info.si_code >= 0)
> + * Nor can they impersonate a kill()/tgkill(), which adds source info.
> + */
> + if (info.si_code != SI_QUEUE) {
> + /* We used to allow any < 0 si_code */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(info.si_code < 0);
> return -EPERM;
Oh, please don't.
Quoting Roland:
Commit da48524eb206 ("Prevent rt_sigqueueinfo and rt_tgsigqueueinfo
from spoofing the signal code") made the check on si_code too strict:
glibc's aio implementation wants to queue signals with SI_ASYNCIO, and
indeed glibc's tst-aio4 fails with the patched kernel.
If stable needs this change, then it probably needs
Relax si_code check in rt_sigqueueinfo and rt_tgsigqueueinfo
commit 243b422af9ea9af4ead07a8ad54c90d4f9b6081a
as well.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists