[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110330213553.GA20571@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:35:53 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH,RFC] perf: panic due to inclied cpu context task_ctx
value
On 03/30, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Anyway how about we do the partial revert below that should get us back
> to a working kernel and is a nice small patch to send -stable wards.
>
> After that we can try and be clever with clearing ->task_ctx from things
> like remove_from_context and the like.
>
> ---
> include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index 311b4dc..04d75a8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ void perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *task, struct task_struct *nex
> {
> perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_CONTEXT_SWITCHES, 1, 1, NULL, 0);
>
> - COND_STMT(&perf_sched_events, __perf_event_task_sched_out(task, next));
> + __perf_event_task_sched_out(task, next);
> }
I agree completely. We need the simple (and suitable for stable) fix first.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists