| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1301522968-4382-1-git-send-email-sage@newdream.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:09:21 -0700
From: Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>
To: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mszeredi@...e.cz,
Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] Do not dentry_unhash() in VFS
Hi Al, everyone,
For the most part the VFS does not hash or unhash dentries outside of
dcache pruning. This is left to the file system namespace methods. The
only exception is on rmdir and directory rename, where we call
dentry_unhash() for the benefit of a few file systems that can't handle
lingering references to the empty and unlinked directory.
This patchset aims to clean this up by pushing the dentry_unhash calls
into each fs where they can be safely removed on a per-fs basis. We
also take this opportunity to finally fix a longstanding bug in
vfs_rename_dir() which rehashes new_dentry (Miklos' patch, see
http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=121666695328987&w=2
http://marc.info/?t=121580579500004&r=1&w=2
).
On a per-fs basis, the dentry_unhash calls can be replaced with
shrink_dcache_parent (or dropped entirely) if it is safe to do so. I
expect that this is safe for most of them.
My hope is that this will move us closer to being able to introduce a
->d_prune d_op. Independent of that, however, I think this is a
worthwhile dcache cleanup.
Thanks!
sage
Miklos Szeredi (1):
vfs: fix vfs_rename_dir for FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE filesystems
Sage Weil (6):
vfs: dentry_unhash immediately prior to rmdir
vfs: remove dget() from dentry_unhash()
vfs: push dentry_unhash on rmdir into file systems
vfs: push dentry_unhash on rename_dir into file systems
vfs: update dentry_unhash() comment
libfs: drop unneeded dentry_unhash
fs/9p/vfs_inode.c | 4 ++++
fs/affs/namei.c | 5 +++++
fs/afs/dir.c | 5 +++++
fs/autofs4/root.c | 2 ++
fs/bfs/dir.c | 3 +++
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 5 +++++
fs/ceph/dir.c | 6 ++++++
fs/cifs/inode.c | 5 +++++
fs/coda/dir.c | 5 +++++
fs/configfs/dir.c | 2 ++
fs/ecryptfs/inode.c | 5 +++++
fs/exofs/namei.c | 5 +++++
fs/ext2/namei.c | 5 +++++
fs/ext3/namei.c | 5 +++++
fs/ext4/namei.c | 5 +++++
fs/fat/namei_msdos.c | 5 +++++
fs/fat/namei_vfat.c | 5 +++++
fs/fuse/dir.c | 6 ++++++
fs/gfs2/ops_inode.c | 5 +++++
fs/hfs/dir.c | 6 ++++++
fs/hfsplus/dir.c | 2 ++
fs/hostfs/hostfs_kern.c | 5 +++++
fs/hpfs/namei.c | 9 ++++++---
fs/jffs2/dir.c | 5 +++++
fs/jfs/namei.c | 5 +++++
fs/libfs.c | 4 ++++
fs/logfs/dir.c | 5 +++++
fs/minix/namei.c | 5 +++++
fs/namei.c | 21 ++++++---------------
fs/ncpfs/dir.c | 5 +++++
fs/nfs/dir.c | 5 +++++
fs/nilfs2/namei.c | 5 +++++
fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 6 ++++++
fs/omfs/dir.c | 5 +++++
fs/reiserfs/namei.c | 5 +++++
fs/reiserfs/xattr.c | 1 -
fs/sysv/namei.c | 5 +++++
fs/ubifs/dir.c | 5 +++++
fs/udf/namei.c | 5 +++++
fs/ufs/namei.c | 5 +++++
40 files changed, 188 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists