linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Power management Kconfig modification for 2.6.39

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTiksT50imm3yQJPrRTqp732=jNYqnNdyvGhGbyHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:24:43 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
	Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@...ubc.ca>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Power management Kconfig modification for 2.6.39

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> That, in fact, is not necessary.  Moreover, it turns out that the patch size
> is not much different, because only a few subsystems use CONFIG_HIBERNATION
> directly.
>
> The patch below has only been slightly tested, in particular I'd like the Xen
> people to check if it works for them.

Ok, this seems to make much more sense. Just from a quick scan, the
places where you changed things to

  #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATE_CALLBACKS

really do seem to be about the freeze/thaw callbacks. So now the patch
looks more logical to me. And it obviously doesn't change the
user-visible questions.

Thank you,

            Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/