linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] omap changes for v2.6.39 merge window

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103310049530.22418@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:56:33 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] omap changes for v2.6.39 merge window

On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:

> * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> [110330 15:22]:
> > On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > 
> > > * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> [110330 14:07]:
> > > > 
> > > > So one person will be not enough, that needs to be a whole team of
> > > > experienced people in the very near future to deal with the massive
> > > > tsunami of crap which is targeted at mainline. If we fail to set that
> > > > up, then we run into a very ugly maintainability issue in no time.
> > > 
> > > One thing that will help here and distribute the load is to move
> > > more things under drivers/ as then we have more maintainers looking
> > > at the code.
> > 
> > Guess what's that going to solve? Nothing, nada.
> > 
> > Really, you move the problem to people who are not prepared to deal
> > with the wave either. So what's the gain?
> 
> I guess my point is that with creating more common frameworks people
> will be using common code. Some examples that come to mind are clock
> framework, gpiolib, dma engine, runtime PM and so on.

For all that to happen you need a really experienced team with a
strong team lead to fight that through and go through the existing
horror while dealing  with the incoming flood at the same time.

See commit 9ad198cb for illustration.

Sigh, I fought that battle for a couple of month to deal with shite
coming in faster than you can fix it and everyone ignoring it.

Thanks,

	tglx



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/