lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimuDf+Qo0e_sVuNX5DavOBSu+Gr-VryeD9aSw_9@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:02:43 +0900
From:	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
To:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
	linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org,
	Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: fix find_next bitops

2011/3/31 Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>:
> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> writes:
>
>> Andreas, do you think it's worth keeping (and fixing) the m68k "optimized"
>> versions?
>
> Should be easy to add the required offset >= size checks.

OK, I'll try to fix the optimized version.
Or, could someone who can test on the real hardware fix this problem?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ