[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimuDf+Qo0e_sVuNX5DavOBSu+Gr-VryeD9aSw_9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:02:43 +0900
From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: fix find_next bitops
2011/3/31 Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>:
> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> writes:
>
>> Andreas, do you think it's worth keeping (and fixing) the m68k "optimized"
>> versions?
>
> Should be easy to add the required offset >= size checks.
OK, I'll try to fix the optimized version.
Or, could someone who can test on the real hardware fix this problem?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists