[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110331064820.GB5938@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:48:20 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] printk: Allocate kernel log buffer earlier v2
* Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
> Subject: printk: Allocate kernel log buffer earlier v2
>
> On larger systems, because of the numerous ACPI, Bootmem and EFI
> messages, the static log buffer overflows before the larger one
> specified by the log_buf_len param is allocated. Minimize the
> overflow by allocating the new log buffer as soon as possible.
>
> The allocation method is passed in as an argument to make
> backporting to "pre-memblock" kernels easier.
Hm, all that allocation pointer magic looks a tad too complex and non-obvious.
Why not just make it as simple and obvious as possible for the current kernel -
and we can still mark it -stable and you backport it to the non-memblock
kernel? That keeps compatibility complexity out of upstream ...
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists