[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D93D29C.5010702@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:02:20 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] RCU: Add TASK_RCU_OFFSET
On 03/30/2011 07:46 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 30.3.2011 12:57, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 12:55 +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
>>> Subject: [PATCH] headers: Allow for lightweight inclusion of task_struct definition
>>>
>>> Factor out a couple of type definitions to <header>_types.h to allow
>>> using task_struct without pulling tons of new dependencies via sched.h.
>>
>> Urgh, not pretty.. so why not clean up sched.h properly? There's way too
>> much cruft in there.
>
> It was a proof-of-concept to show that it is doable to have proper
> definition of task_struct in rcupdate.h. Not an entry for any code
> beauty contest.
>
> Michal
>
I like this cleanup, could you continue for this hard job? I will help you if required.
Ingo & Peter - will you accept the patches when it is done.
Acked-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists