[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1301571096.4859.243.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:31:36 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] Move task's RCU code to rcupdate.h
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 10:58 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> +struct task_rcu_struct {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
> + int rcu_read_lock_nesting;
> + char rcu_read_unlock_special;
Is there a good reason that's a char? It'll leave a 3 byte hole in this
location.
> + struct list_head rcu_node_entry;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> + struct rcu_node *rcu_blocked_node;
> +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST
> + struct rt_mutex *rcu_boost_mutex;
> +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
> +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
> +};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists