[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110331132533.GC17547@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:25:33 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>, david@...g.hm,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] omap changes for v2.6.39 merge window
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:41:52PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:06:34AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > Having strong, effective platform abstractions inside the kernel really helps
> > > even if the hardware space itself is inevitably fragmented: both powerpc and
> > > x86 has shown that. Until you realize and appreciate that you really have not
> > > understood the problem i think.
> >
> > No, I think it is the other way around. Folk like me and Nicolas over the
> > last ten years have put considerable amounts of effort into trying to keep
> > the ARM support code as clean and maintainable as possible.
>
> Absolutely no argument about that, whenever i have read core ARM code it was
> always a pleasure. You guys are doing a fine job there.
Thanks for your vote of confidence. It's really appreciated.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists