lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:13:24 -0300
From:	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@....org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] mce: fix RCU lockdep from mce_poll()

Based on the following message

===================================================
[ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
---------------------------------------------------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c:1628 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!

other info that might help us debug this:

rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
no locks held by mcelog/2350.

stack backtrace:
Pid: 2350, comm: mcelog Tainted: G        W   2.6.37-rc1+ #7
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8108e6d4>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xa4/0xc0
 [<ffffffff810189e9>] mce_poll+0xa9/0xd0
 [<ffffffff81160585>] do_sys_poll+0x275/0x550
 [<ffffffff8115f0e0>] ? __pollwait+0x0/0xf0
 [<ffffffff8115f1d0>] ? pollwake+0x0/0x60
 [<ffffffff8115f1d0>] ? pollwake+0x0/0x60
 [<ffffffff8130431c>] ? rcu_read_lock_held+0x2c/0x30
 [<ffffffff8130549a>] ? radix_tree_lookup_element+0xda/0x100
 [<ffffffff81121f08>] ? __do_fault+0x128/0x470
 [<ffffffff81100bdb>] ? filemap_fault+0xdb/0x4e0
 [<ffffffff810ffe75>] ? unlock_page+0x25/0x30
 [<ffffffff81069ddf>] ? sigprocmask+0x3f/0x100
 [<ffffffff8183672b>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x60
 [<ffffffff8108fefd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13d/0x180
 [<ffffffff8108ff4d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
 [<ffffffff8183672b>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x60
 [<ffffffff811608a7>] sys_ppoll+0x47/0x190
 [<ffffffff8108fefd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13d/0x180
 [<ffffffff81835d39>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
 [<ffffffff810030eb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

This code is simply checking the value of the pointer, and therefore need not protect any actual dereferences.
Replace rcu_dereference_check_mce() with rcu_dereference_index_check().

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@....org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
This patch reflects the summary of the activity in https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/5/236

 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index 5a05ef6..6cad5dc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -1626,7 +1626,8 @@ out:
 static unsigned int mce_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
 {
 	poll_wait(file, &mce_wait, wait);
-	if (rcu_dereference_check_mce(mcelog.next))
+	if (rcu_dereference_index_check(mcelog.next,
+					rcu_read_lock_sched_held()))
 		return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
 	if (!mce_apei_read_done && apei_check_mce())
 		return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
-- 
1.7.1



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ