[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTik=WBy7CRQSENiiRfi2BFtwL5iT9d3RBK4uZz1d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:58:14 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: excessive kworker activity when idle. (was Re: vma corruption in
today's -git)
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> That's a recent change though, and I first saw this back in November.
So your November report said that you could see "thousands" of these a
second. But maybe it didn't use up all CPU until recently?
Especially if you have a high CONFIG_HZ value, you'd still see a
thousand flushes a second even with the old "delay a bit". So it would
use a fair amount of CPU, and certainly waste a lot of power. But it
wouldn't pin the CPU entirely.
With that commit f23eb2b2b285, the buggy case would become basically
totally CPU-bound.
I dunno. Right now 'trinity' just ends up printing out a lot of system
call errors for me. I assume that's its normal behavior?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists