[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikCEnWjgqSaXnMWTEhzqK9h9Sra5_XRkAQwjZrd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:17:05 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] memblock: add error return when CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
is not set
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
>
>>
>> setup_log_buf will pass function pointer, So this one is not needed,
>> right?
>
> The other function would need the #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK before calling
> memblock_alloc which I thought was the point of this patch? Note we still
> have the last fallback of using alloc_boot_mem in kernel/init.c.
before that patch, it already use bootmem allocation.
So should be ok to drop this one.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists