[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <op.vs7umufd3l0zgt@mnazarewicz-glaptop>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:26:45 +0200
From: "Michal Nazarewicz" <mina86@...a86.com>
To: "Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, "Kyungmin Park" <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"Ankita Garg" <ankita@...ibm.com>,
"Daniel Walker" <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
"Johan MOSSBERG" <johan.xx.mossberg@...ricsson.com>,
"Mel Gorman" <mel@....ul.ie>, "Pawel Osciak" <pawel@...iak.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] mm: alloc_contig_range() added
> On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 15:16 +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> + ret = 0;
>> + while (!PageBuddy(pfn_to_page(start & (~0UL << ret))))
>> + if (WARN_ON(++ret >= MAX_ORDER))
>> + return -EINVAL;
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:02:41 +0200, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Holy cow, that's dense. Is there really no more straightforward way to
> do that?
Which part exactly is dense? What would be qualify as a more
straightforward way?
> In any case, please pull the ++ret bit out of the WARN_ON(). Some
> people like to do:
>
> #define WARN_ON(...) do{}while(0)
>
> to save space on some systems.
I don't think that's the case. Even if WARN_ON() decides not to print
a warning, it will still return the value of the argument. If not,
a lot of code will brake.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +-----<email/xmpp: mnazarewicz@...gle.com>-----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists