[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110330193404.9525b4e9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:34:04 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]mmap: improve scalability for updating vm_committed_as
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:56:43 +0800 Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com> wrote:
> > This is a big change, and it wasn't even changelogged. It's
> > potentially a tremendous increase in the expense of a read from
> > /proc/meminfo, which is a file that lots of tools will be polling.
> > Many of those tools we don't even know about or have access to.
> Assume we don't read /proc/meminfo too often.
That's a poor assumption. top(1) and vmstat(8) read it, for a start.
There will be zillions of locally-developed monitoring tools which read
meminfo.
Now, it could be that something under meminfo reads _already_ does a
massive walk across all CPUs. If so then we'll have already trained
people to avoid reading /proc/meminfo and this change might be
acceptable.
But if this isn't the case then it's quite likely that this change will
hurt some people quite a lot. And, unfortunately, the sort of people
who we will hurt tend to be people who don't run our stuff until a long
time (years) after we wrote it. By which time it's going to be quite
expensive to get a fix down the chain and into their hands.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists