[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1A1D7947-0B6F-4847-BCA5-7FCE76B36C2F@cs.ubc.ca>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:38:42 -0400
From: Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@...ubc.ca>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@...ubc.ca>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Power management Kconfig modification for 2.6.39
On 2011-03-30, at 6:39 PM, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> On Thursday, March 31, 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>>> That, in fact, is not necessary. Moreover, it turns out that the patch size
>>> is not much different, because only a few subsystems use CONFIG_HIBERNATION
>>> directly.
>>>
>>> The patch below has only been slightly tested, in particular I'd like the Xen
>>> people to check if it works for them.
>>
>> Ok, this seems to make much more sense. Just from a quick scan, the
>> places where you changed things to
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATE_CALLBACKS
>>
>> really do seem to be about the freeze/thaw callbacks. So now the patch
>> looks more logical to me. And it obviously doesn't change the
>> user-visible questions.
>>
>> Thank you,
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
> @Shriram: Can you please test if the new patch works with your other Xen
> patches?
>
> Rafael
>
Yep. Surely. Will get back to you in a couple of days.
Shriram--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists