linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] uio/pdrv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110331192302.GD2734@local>
Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:23:02 +0200
From:	"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>
To:	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Cc:	"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>,
	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	john.williams@...alogix.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	hjk@...utronix.de, gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uio/pdrv_genirq: Add OF support

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 07:57:47PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hans J. Koch wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 03:28:41PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> >>>>+		uioinfo->name = pdev->dev.of_node->name;
> >>>>+		/* Use version for storing full IP name for identification */
> >>>>+		uioinfo->version = pdev->dev.of_node->full_name;
> >>>I don't think this is apropriate, but will leave that to Hans.
> >>I was thinking what to add and I choose full_name because I can read
> >>this value and identify which UIO is this device.
> >>I know that there should be version but there is no version string in DTS.
> >
> >The purpose of uio_info->version is to give the userspace part of the driver
> >additional information. Kernel part and userspace part might be developed
> >independently, and there should be a chance for the userspace part to find
> >out if a certain feature is already supported by the kernel part without
> >having to do dirty kernel version checks.
> >
> >So, uio_info->version is an information about the driver, not the hardware.
> >
> >Example: You write a UIO driver for a chip you use in a project. You don't
> >need all the functionality of that chip. One year later you need additional
> >chip functionality, and it turns out that you have to do certain
> >initializations in the kernel part. Your new userspace will need the new
> >kernel driver, but there are lots of older kernels around in your customers
> >devices. In that case, your userspace part can simply check the version
> >string in sysfs and require at least your new version.
> 
> I understand reasons but this information is not in device tree and
> it must be setup.
> Grant suggested compatible string but it is not the best option too.

In uio_pdrv_genirq, uio_info->version is hardcoded in platform data. Hardware
initialization can also take place in the same platform specific file, which
is common practice on archs like ARM. Therefore, a driver specific versioning
can make sense for UIO, even if the driver code itself doesn't change.

If you have no equivalent for that in device tree, you should create a new
generic driver (uio_of_genirq?) that simply doesn't support this kind of
versioning.

Seems like sometimes it's not enough to just describe hardware...

Thanks,
Hans

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/