[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110331192429.GD14441@home.goodmis.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:24:30 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Ankita Garg <ankita@...ibm.com>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
Johan MOSSBERG <johan.xx.mossberg@...ricsson.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Pawel Osciak <pawel@...iak.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] mm: alloc_contig_freed_pages() added
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 08:58:03AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 15:16 +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >
> > +unsigned long alloc_contig_freed_pages(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> > + gfp_t flag)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long pfn = start, count;
> > + struct page *page;
> > + struct zone *zone;
> > + int order;
> > +
> > + VM_BUG_ON(!pfn_valid(start));
>
> This seems kinda mean. Could we return an error? I understand that
> this is largely going to be an early-boot thing, but surely trying to
> punt on crappy input beats a full-on BUG().
>
> if (!pfn_valid(start))
> return -1;
But still keep the warning?
if (WARN_ON(!pfn_valid(start))
return -1;
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists