[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110331223914.458a36b7@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:39:14 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc: Jack Stone <jwjstone@...tmail.fm>, Mac <kmac@...zta.fm>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Subject: Re: 'scheduling while atomic' during ppp connection on 2.6.37.1 and
2.6.38
> What is the proper way to avoid a race with HUP in tty->ops->write,
> chars_in_buffer, ntty_write_room and possibly others?
You shouldn't need to do anything in those cases as tty and
tty->driver_data won't be going anywhere. port->tty may go NULL and the
IRQ handlers etc need to get the refs properly and keep refs when needed
so the tty isn't freed under them, but that *should* be all that is
needed if the logic is right.
> I looked into the drivers, moxa tests tty->driver_data (why? [1]), mxser
> does nothing as well as rocket and many others. What is the reference
> driver I should look into?
I think its a delusion from early drivers that never got sorted
>
> [1] Perhaps leftover from when moxa_shutdown used to NULL it.
>
> I don't see why the driver should care at all. It has a tty,
> tty->driver_data and thus all the HW info. So it should ignore the race,
> i.e. test nothing, right?
Yes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists