[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110331225618.GB7484@dhcp231-156.rdu.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:56:18 -0400
From: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>
To: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@...cle.com>
Cc: Tristan Ye <tristan.ye@...cle.com>, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
josef@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
chris.mason@...cle.com, jlbec@...lplan.org, tm@....ma
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] VFS/ioctl: Add punching-hole support to ioctl().
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 02:14:43PM -0700, Sunil Mushran wrote:
> Frankly I see no point extending the ioctl interface when we have
> a syscall interface.
>
I'd even go so far as to say we could probably axe the xfs and ocfs2 ioctls
since we have the fallocate interface :). Thanks,
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists