[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1104011127480.22712@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:28:36 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 idle APM: delete apm_cpu_idle(), and its use of
pm_idle
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Len Brown wrote:
> From: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
>
> There is some doubt whether the APM idle feature
> to call into the BIOS from the idle loop is reliable.
> Certainly it was known to fail on some machines,
> but more importantly, APM machines have not shipped
> for a decade and so finding machines to test the code
> is problematic.
>
> After this patch, systems running in APM mode will
> simply run default_idle() and HALT without calling
> into the BIOS from their idle loop.
>
> This deletes a much-maligned modular user of the (pm_idle)()
> function pointer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> ---
> Jiri,
> If you can review, test, ack, that would be great.
> I'll probably end up shipping this via the idle tree
> because subsequent patches to delete pm_idle
> will depend on it.
Looks fine, works here.
Acked-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Thanks Len.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists