[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CEE6BB42CAD6E947908279175AF8470A0C79DED455@EXDCVYMBSTM006.EQ1STM.local>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 12:03:42 +0200
From: Robert ROSENGREN <robert.rosengren@...ricsson.com>
To: "lrg@...mlogic.co.uk" <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
"broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Bengt JONSSON <bengt.g.jonsson@...ricsson.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] regulator: recursive locking detected
Regrettably, this patch came out only in half. Please disregard, updated
patch will be sent instantly. Sorry for my spamming!
BR,
Robert
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 11:33 +0200, Robert ROSENGREN wrote:
> "possible recursive locking detected"-warnings are issued when a
> regulator has specified supply regulator. Both when enabling and
> disabling regulators uses recursive call chains for notify the supply
> regulators. This is due to locking mutexes of the same lock class,
> i.e. the locks reside in the regulator_dev struct.
>
> Since this is valid behavior for the regulators, this patch changes the
> mutex lock into nested, as suggested in lockdep-design.txt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Rosengren <robert.rosengren@...ricsson.com>
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/core.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 3ffc697..2a66c6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static int _regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev);
> static int _regulator_get_current_limit(struct regulator_dev *rdev);
> static unsigned int _regulator_get_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev);
> static void _notifier_call_chain(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> - unsigned long event, void *data);
> + unsigned long event, void *data, int lock_sublevel);
> static int _regulator_do_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> int min_uV, int max_uV);
>
> @@ -1407,7 +1407,7 @@ static int _regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> trace_regulator_disable_complete(rdev_get_name(rdev));
>
> _notifier_call_chain(rdev, REGULATOR_EVENT_DISABLE,
> - NULL);
> + NULL, 0);
> }
>
> /* decrease our supplies ref count and disable if required */
> @@ -1477,7 +1477,7 @@ static int _regulator_force_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> }
> /* notify other consumers that power has been forced off */
> _notifier_call_chain(rdev, REGULATOR_EVENT_FORCE_DISABLE |
> - REGULATOR_EVENT_DISABLE, NULL);
> + REGULATOR_EVENT_DISABLE, NULL, 0);
> }
>
> /* decrease our supplies ref count and disable if required */
> @@ -1699,7 +1699,7 @@ static int _regulator_do_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
>
> if (ret == 0)
> _notifier_call_chain(rdev, REGULATOR_EVENT_VOLTAGE_CHANGE,
> - NULL);
> + NULL, 0);
>
> trace_regulator_set_voltage_complete(rdev_get_name(rdev), selector);
>
> @@ -2167,19 +2167,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_unregister_notifier);
>
> /* notify regulator consumers and downstream regulator consumers.
> * Note mutex must be held by caller.
> + * lock_sublevel should always be 0, only used for recursive calls.
> */
> static void _notifier_call_chain(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> - unsigned long event, void *data)
> + unsigned long event, void *data, int lock_sublevel)
> {
> struct regulator_dev *_rdev;
>
> /* call rdev chain first */
> blocking_notifier_call_chain(&rdev->notifier, event, NULL);
>
> + /* increase sublevel before stepping into nested regulators */
> + lock_sublevel++;
> +
> /* now notify regulator we supply */
> list_for_each_entry(_rdev, &rdev->supply_list, slist) {
> - mutex_lock(&_rdev->mutex);
> - _notifier_call_chain(_rdev, event, data);
> + mutex_lock_nested(&_rdev->mutex, lock_sublevel);
> + _notifier_call_chain(_rdev, event, data, lock_sublevel);
> mutex_unlock(&_rdev->mutex);
> }
> }
> @@ -2333,7 +2337,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_bulk_free);
> int regulator_notifier_call_chain(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> unsigned long event, void *data)
> {
> - _notifier_call_chain(rdev, event, data);
> + _notifier_call_chain(rdev, event, data, 0);
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
>
> }
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
Download attachment "winmail.dat" of type "application/ms-tnef" (4706 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists