[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110401181301.GE9010@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:13:01 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: jan.kratochvil@...hat.com, vda.linux@...glemail.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, indan@....nu, roland@...k.frob.com
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] ptrace: ptrace_check_attach() should not do
s/STOPPED/TRACED/
After "ptrace: Clean transitions between TASK_STOPPED and TRACED"
d79fdd6d96f46fabb779d86332e3677c6f5c2a4f, ptrace_check_attach()
should never see a TASK_STOPPED tracee and s/STOPPED/TRACED/ is
no longer legal. Add the warning.
Note: ptrace_check_attach() can be greatly simplified, in particular
it doesn't need tasklist. But I'd prefer another patch for that.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/ptrace.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- ptrace/kernel/ptrace.c~4_ck_attach_cant_be_stopped 2011-04-01 16:36:29.000000000 +0200
+++ ptrace/kernel/ptrace.c 2011-04-01 19:54:05.000000000 +0200
@@ -112,16 +112,14 @@ int ptrace_check_attach(struct task_stru
*/
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
if ((child->ptrace & PT_PTRACED) && child->parent == current) {
- ret = 0;
/*
* child->sighand can't be NULL, release_task()
* does ptrace_unlink() before __exit_signal().
*/
spin_lock_irq(&child->sighand->siglock);
- if (task_is_stopped(child))
- child->state = TASK_TRACED;
- else if (!task_is_traced(child) && !kill)
- ret = -ESRCH;
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(task_is_stopped(child));
+ if (task_is_traced(child) || kill)
+ ret = 0;
spin_unlock_irq(&child->sighand->siglock);
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists