[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <in59jj$ue6$1@dough.gmane.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 21:40:16 +0200
From: "Christophe JAILLET" <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] page: get_order() optimization
Hi,
why not have something like :
> + order = 0;
> + if (size != 0)
> + order = (__builtin_clzl(size) ^ (BITS_PER_LONG - 1));
we avoid the "complex" computation when not necessary.
No ?
Best regards,
Christophe JAILLET
"Maksym Planeta" <mcsim.planeta@...il.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:1301685493-2567-1-git-send-email-mcsim.planeta@...il.com...
> Loop was repalaced with __builtin_clz(). This still allows to precompute
> constants, but on some architectures it uses special instruction to
> calculate order.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maksym Planeta <mcsim.planeta@...il.com>
> ---
> include/asm-generic/getorder.h | 8 +++-----
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/getorder.h
b/include/asm-generic/getorder.h
> index 67e7245..fe8020c 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/getorder.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/getorder.h
> @@ -11,11 +11,9 @@ static inline __attribute_const__ int
get_order(unsigned long size)
> int order;
>
> size = (size - 1) >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 1);
> - order = -1;
> - do {
> - size >>= 1;
> - order++;
> - } while (size);
> + order = (__builtin_clzl(size) ^ (BITS_PER_LONG - 1));
> + if (size == 0)
> + order = 0;
> return order;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.2.3
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists