[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D9643F1.1090807@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:30:25 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Michael Leun <lkml20101129@...ton.leun.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Mike Pagano <mpagano@...too.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.38.2 breaks suspend to disk
On 04/01/2011 02:24 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:21 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>> On 04/01/2011 12:54 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> ok, please check if you are happy with this one.
>>>
>>
>> The best would simply be:
>>
>> mmu_cr4_features = read_cr4_safe();
>>
>> If this has to run before we can handle exceptions, one can verify the
>> existence by testing for the CPUID instruction (a CPU has CR4 if and
>> only if it has CPUID):
>>
>> if (boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level >= 0)
>> mmu_cr4_features = read_cr4_safe();
>>
>> ... since we set cpuid_level to -1 if there is no CPUID instruction.
>
> in that case could use read_cr4 directly.
>
> please check attached -v4
>
Err, yes, that's what I meant.
Now, why the heck did you introduce a bunch of CONFIG_HIBERNATION #ifdefs?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists