linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: BUG() dies silently

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTim8GhUAZ7L-MiJiqi6xM=P_Q8kqfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 1 Apr 2011 15:29:08 -0700
From:	Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@...com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	lk <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	lak <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: BUG() dies silently

Hi Stephen,

Sorry for the confusion, but in fact I was talking about the patch to
make ARM use the generic bug handling via an undef instruction instead
of calling ______bug() or writing to memory address 0. Please see
here:

http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=6808/1

Regards,
Simon

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On 3/31/2011 6:47 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> You might try the generic bug patch and see if it also fixes this
>> problem - Simon
>
> It probably won't because presumably Omar has CONFIG_BUG=n otherwise
> Omar would have sent a patch against __bug() in arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
>
> --
> Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/