[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D965BED.5000309@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:12:45 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Michael Leun <lkml20101129@...ton.leun.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Mike Pagano <mpagano@...too.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.38.2 breaks suspend to disk
On 04/01/2011 04:04 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On 04/01/2011 02:42 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>
>> And why on Earth is it worth saving a couple of instructions (and
>> introducing code ugliness and a more complex testing matrix) in the case
>> when it is not?
>
> Please check this one, it moves storing mmu_cr4 to arch_prepare_suspend.
>
You keep moving things around instead of answering the question. It
might be the right thing to do, but I would like an answer why, in your
opinion, the easy way isn't feasible.
For suspend/resume, the right thing really is just to save CR4 like any
other processor register.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists