[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110401062006.GC32378@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 08:20:06 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
kurup_avinash@...oo.com, maciej.rutecki@...il.com, rjw@...k.pl,
sedat.dilek@...il.com, stable@...nel.org, #.34+@...atten.dmk.lab
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86, ioapic: Skip looking for ioapic overrides when
ioapics are not present
* Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org> wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> @@ -3789,6 +3789,10 @@ int acpi_get_override_irq(u32 gsi, int *trigger, int *polarity)
> {
> int ioapic, pin, idx;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> + if (acpi_irq_model != ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_IOAPIC)
> + return -1;
> +#endif
That #ifdef is very ugly. Please introduce a suitable helper function in
arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h - acpi_irq_ioapic_model() or so, which could be
used like this:
if (!acpi_irq_ioapic_model())
return -1;
And would be defined in the !CONFIG_ACPI case as well.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists