linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 2 Apr 2011 13:02:09 +0200
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>, dedekind1@...il.com,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s

On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> cc'ing Jens ...
>>
>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:22:41 +0200 Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com> wrote:
>>> > On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 18:10 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>> >> > Cc'ing Artem,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 17:55:52 +0200 Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com> wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> With CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y set, I see in my build.log:
>>> >> >> ...
>>> >> >> MODPOST 2742 modules
>>> >> >> ...
>>> >> >> ERROR: "empty_aops" [fs/ubifs/ubifs.ko] undefined!
>>> >> >> make[5]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
>>> >> >> make[4]: *** [modules] Error 2
>>> >> >> make[3]: *** [sub-make] Error 2
>>> >> >> make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
>>> >> >> make[2]: Leaving directory
>>> >> >> `/home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.39-rc1/debian/build/build_i386_none_686-iniza'
>>> >> >>
[...]
> Just FYI:
> I contacted Jens last night and he refreshed his for-linus GIT branch.
> Adding missing include <linux/fs.h> did not fix the issue.
> I am trying with the attached one.
>
> - Sedat -
>

I have split the single patch into two, first reflects ther build-error.
The second considers {inode,file}_operations have also undefined
functions by using "unified" empty_{iops,fops} as used in other fs/*
files.

- Sedat -

View attachment "0001-nilfs2-ubifs-Fix-error-empty_aops-undefined.patch" of type "text/plain" (2166 bytes)

View attachment "0002-ubifs-Move-inode-file-_operations-to-create_xattr-an.patch" of type "text/plain" (1795 bytes)