[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110402043804.GB3989@riccoc20.at.omicron.at>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 06:38:04 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, david@...g.hm,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] omap changes for v2.6.39 merge window
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 04:19:31PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
> In a perfect world the bootloader would be bug free and always up to
> date with the best DT data. In practice I'm very skeptical this will
> always be the case and painless. At least the above makes it very
> simple to have a self contained kernel when (not if) need be.
Yes, my experience with DT on powerpc teaches me that, although DT
sounds wonderful in theory, in practice kernel/dtb/uboot form a love
triangle (or perhaps a hate triangle) where all three points must be
exactly up to date with each other. If one part is even just a month
or two too old/new, then your kernel might not boot.
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists