linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTin4T0CZPK_Vmk=UEh63+6CXM2f7Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 4 Apr 2011 00:19:31 +0200
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	"dedekind1@...il.com" <dedekind1@...il.com>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com> wrote:
> On 2011-04-02 13:02, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>>> cc'ing Jens ...
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:22:41 +0200 Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 18:10 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Cc'ing Artem,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 17:55:52 +0200 Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> With CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y set, I see in my build.log:
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> MODPOST 2742 modules
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> ERROR: "empty_aops" [fs/ubifs/ubifs.ko] undefined!
>>>>>>>>> make[5]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
>>>>>>>>> make[4]: *** [modules] Error 2
>>>>>>>>> make[3]: *** [sub-make] Error 2
>>>>>>>>> make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
>>>>>>>>> make[2]: Leaving directory
>>>>>>>>> `/home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.39-rc1/debian/build/build_i386_none_686-iniza'
>>>>>>>>>
>> [...]
>>> Just FYI:
>>> I contacted Jens last night and he refreshed his for-linus GIT branch.
>>> Adding missing include <linux/fs.h> did not fix the issue.
>>> I am trying with the attached one.
>>>
>>> - Sedat -
>>>
>>
>> I have split the single patch into two, first reflects ther build-error.
>> The second considers {inode,file}_operations have also undefined
>> functions by using "unified" empty_{iops,fops} as used in other fs/*
>> files.
>
> What are these patches against? Not for-next nor my for-linus.
>

I tested with linux-next (next-20110401) as base and pulled-in your
for-linus GIT branch.

- Sedat -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/