linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/8] Documentation: consolidate leds files to leds/ subdir

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Apr 2011 10:25:40 +0200
From:	Antonio Ospite <ospite@...denti.unina.it>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] Documentation: consolidate leds files to leds/
 subdir

On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 17:54:04 -0700
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> >  - don't use git renames
> 
> Actually, I think it would make it much easier to validate the patches
> if you used git rename patches for things like this.
>

I agree, and I did that for the first review round.

Initially the patch was meant to be handled by Andrew Morton, maybe I
misunderstood one of his comments from
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-doc/msg02562.html :

	"hm, these look like funky git renames.  patch(1) doesn't
	handle those."

and though he wanted me to change that.

> As a traditional patch, it's impossible to see that "yes, it's a
> rename". There might be tons of changes hiding in the add/remove pair.
> 
>                           Linus
> 

-- 
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it

PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
   See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped