[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110405102540.091ec116.ospite@studenti.unina.it>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 10:25:40 +0200
From: Antonio Ospite <ospite@...denti.unina.it>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] Documentation: consolidate leds files to leds/
subdir
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 17:54:04 -0700
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - don't use git renames
>
> Actually, I think it would make it much easier to validate the patches
> if you used git rename patches for things like this.
>
I agree, and I did that for the first review round.
Initially the patch was meant to be handled by Andrew Morton, maybe I
misunderstood one of his comments from
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-doc/msg02562.html :
"hm, these look like funky git renames. patch(1) doesn't
handle those."
and though he wanted me to change that.
> As a traditional patch, it's impossible to see that "yes, it's a
> rename". There might be tons of changes hiding in the add/remove pair.
>
> Linus
>
--
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it
PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists