linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] mmc_spi: Add support for regulator framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Apr 2011 10:43:47 +0200
From:	Antonio Ospite <ospite@...denti.unina.it>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Ribeiro <drwyrm@...il.com>,
	David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>, Ernst Schwab <eschwab@...ine.de>,
	Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@...log.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	openezx-devel@...ts.openezx.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mmc_spi: Add support for regulator framework

On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 21:05:43 -0600
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 11:56:31AM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:46:38 +0100
> > Antonio Ospite <ospite@...denti.unina.it> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > this patchset has the purpose of adding support for the regulator framework to 
> > > the mmc_spi driver. The first three patches are preparatory cleanups to make 
> > > the fourth one more straightforward.
> > > 
> > > Maybe the fourth patch can be improved, I am open to any suggestions about it.
> > >
> > 
> > Ping. I forgot to Cc spi-devel-general on this series, should I resend
> > it?
> 
> Not a bad idea.  It doesn't go via my tree since it is an mmc patch,
> not an spi one, but I don't mind taking a look at the spi bits.
> 

Grant you were on Cc from the start so you should have the patches
somewhere; please tell me if you don't.
I'd avoid resending if not strictly necessary.

Regards,
   Antonio

-- 
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it

PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
   See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped