[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1302010089.2225.1313.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:28:09 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 13/15] sched: expire slack quota using generation
counters
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 20:03 -0700, Paul Turner wrote:
Argh, this patch is terrible for the reason that it changes the whole
accounting just introduced and me having to re-open all the previous
patches to look up hth stuff worked before.
> @@ -436,8 +438,10 @@ void init_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandw
> raw_spin_lock_init(&cfs_b->lock);
> cfs_b->quota = cfs_b->runtime = quota;
> cfs_b->period = ns_to_ktime(period);
> + cfs_b->quota_generation = 0;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cfs_b->throttled_cfs_rq);
>
> +
> hrtimer_init(&cfs_b->period_timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> cfs_b->period_timer.function = sched_cfs_period_timer;
We're in desperate need of more whitespace there? :-)
> @@ -9333,6 +9337,8 @@ static int tg_set_cfs_bandwidth(struct t
> raw_spin_lock_irq(&cfs_b->lock);
> cfs_b->period = ns_to_ktime(period);
> cfs_b->runtime = cfs_b->quota = quota;
> +
> + cfs_bump_quota_generation(cfs_b);
> raw_spin_unlock_irq(&cfs_b->lock);
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> Index: tip/kernel/sched_fair.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tip.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ tip/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -1331,11 +1331,25 @@ static void check_cfs_rq_quota(struct cf
> resched_task(rq_of(cfs_rq)->curr);
> }
>
> +static void cfs_bump_quota_generation(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
> +{
> + cfs_b->quota_generation++;
> + smp_mb();
> +}
Memory barriers come in pairs and with a comment, you fail on both
counts.
> +
> +static inline int cfs_rq_quota_current(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> +{
> + struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = tg_cfs_bandwidth(cfs_rq->tg);
> +
> + return cfs_rq->quota_generation == cfs_b->quota_generation;
> +}
> +
> static void request_cfs_rq_quota(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> {
> struct task_group *tg = cfs_rq->tg;
> struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = tg_cfs_bandwidth(tg);
> u64 amount = 0, min_amount;
> + int generation;
Not initialized,
> min_amount = sched_cfs_bandwidth_slice() + (-cfs_rq->quota_remaining);
>
> @@ -1347,10 +1361,18 @@ static void request_cfs_rq_quota(struct
> } else {
> amount = min_amount;
> }
> + generation = cfs_b->quota_generation;
> raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock);
> }
and since there's an if there, one can fail it, leaving generation
uninitialized,
>
> + /* a deficit should be carried forwards, surplus should be dropped */
> +
> + if (generation != cfs_rq->quota_generation &&
> + cfs_rq->quota_remaining > 0)
> + cfs_rq->quota_remaining = 0;
> +
> cfs_rq->quota_remaining += amount;
> + cfs_rq->quota_generation = generation;
> }
Resulting in uninitialized usage right there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists